Certified facilities by state
R2v3 Certified Facilities in Georgia
Georgia has 42 vendors holding a current R2v3 certification, operating 42 facilities in the state. 48 vendors are listed in Georgia in total; the 6 not counted above hold no certification the issuing register currently shows as live.
“Current” means the register that issued the certification still shows it as live, not that we once saw a certificate. Verified against the issuing register between 12 Sept 2026 and 14 Sept 2026.
Appendix scope
Appendix scope has been read for 8 of the 42 certified vendors in Georgia, as at 4 Sept 2026. Of those 8: 6 hold Appendix B for data sanitization — 6 for logical erasure, 6 for physical destruction.
The remaining 34 have not been read. Absence of an appendix below is “not read”, never “does not hold”.
What R2v3 certification does and does not tell you
R2v3 is not a single credential. A facility is certified to the Core Requirements and then to whichever process appendices match the work it actually does. Appendix A covers the downstream recycling chain and applies to every certified facility. The rest are optional and specific.
Appendix B covers data sanitization. A facility without it is not necessarily unable to destroy data — under SERI’s own guidance, basic physical destruction can be performed under Core Requirement 7, and sanitization can be outsourced to a qualified downstream vendor. What the absence of Appendix B means is that the enhanced controls, traceability and record-keeping of that appendix do not apply — so a buyer who needs them has to ask where the work is actually done.
A certification badge on its own does not say which appendices a facility holds. Where the register publishes the scope, this directory prints it beside the badge; where it has not been read yet, the badge says so rather than leaving a blank that reads as “no restrictions”.
R2v3 Appendix B certifies to Clear, not to Purge.
R2v3 Appendix B(13) requires sampling sufficient to demonstrate that data is “not recoverable by commercial software”. SERI’s own guidance places commercial software “at a level between basic visual inspection for data and forensic laboratory analysis”. That is the Clear threshold. Purge, in both NIST SP 800-88 Rev. 2 (September 2025) and IEEE 2883-2022, is defined against state-of-the-art laboratory techniques.
Appendix B(11)(a) scopes the requirement to user-addressable locations. On solid-state media that does not reach overprovisioned blocks, metadata, cache, or unallocated NVM — and NIST SP 800-88 Rev. 2 §4.5.2 names exactly that gap as a validation red flag.
R2v3 Appendix B does not, by its own stated assurance level, guarantee an SP 800-88 Purge or an IEEE 2883 Purge. A buyer who needs Purge-level assurance must specify it contractually in addition to R2v3 certification.
NIST SP 800-88 Rev. 1 was withdrawn on 26 September 2025 and superseded in its entirety by Rev. 2. A policy, contract, or vendor answer that cites “NIST 800-88” without a revision is citing two documents that no longer say the same thing: Rev. 2 §4.5.1 states that elaborate sampling after a clear or purge “is not necessary” unless organizational policy requires it, and its Appendix D change log records that almost all verification language was removed. Per-asset evidence is still worth requiring — but it is the buyer’s requirement, not NIST’s, and has to be asked for as one.
Sources: SERI, R2v3 Appendix Determination Tool · SERI, Specialty Process Requirements · NIST SP 800-88 Rev. 2 (September 2025).
What Georgia requires of a business retiring IT equipment
There is no Georgia electronic waste recycling act. Searching the full text of Title 10 and Title 12 of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated for electronic waste, e-waste and cathode ray returns nothing, and EPD's own index of environmental rules lists 391-3-4 for solid waste and 391-3-11 for hazardous waste with no rule addressing electronics, computers or CRTs at all. EPD's recycling page treats electronics as a voluntary material-specific topic and points at third-party national programmes rather than at any Georgia requirement.
Sources: Georgia EPD, recycling and waste reduction resources · Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. Subject 391-3-4, solid waste management · Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. Subject 391-3-11, hazardous waste management
The act vendors keep citing was real, and it was repealed
Several recycling vendors assert that Georgia has a Georgia Computer Equipment Disposal and Recycling Act. It is worth being precise about what is wrong with that, because the usual correction — that no such act exists — is itself not quite right.
O.C.G.A. 12-8-33.1 did exist. Its catchline read Improper disposal of computer equipment; Computer Equipment Disposal and Recycling Council created; compensation; powers and duties, and it was enacted by Ga. L. 2002, p. 1086, Section 1. It was repealed by Ga. L. 2007, p. 47, Section 12/SB 103, effective 11 May 2007, and the code has carried it as repealed ever since. So a vendor citing it is citing a provision that was removed from Georgia law nineteen years ago, not one that was invented. Either way it imposes nothing on anybody today, and a compliance obligation should not be accepted on its authority.
Sources: O.C.G.A. 12-8-33.1, repealed
And no landfill ban reaches electronics
Georgia's disposal restrictions are material-specific, and computers, servers, storage, monitors and televisions appear in none of them. Lead acid vehicle batteries are the cleanest: under O.C.G.A. 12-8-28(a), after January 1, 1991, no person may place a used lead acid vehicle battery in mixed municipal solid waste or discard or otherwise dispose of a lead acid vehicle battery except by delivery to one of four named destinations.
The other restrictions are more conditional than they are usually described. Scrap tires are not simply banned: 12-8-40.1(b) provides that after December 31, 1994, no person may dispose of scrap tires in a solid waste landfill unless the scrap tires are shredded, chopped, or chipped in accordance with standards established by the board, and then one of three further conditions is met. Yard trimmings under 12-8-40.2(a) may not be placed in or mixed with municipal solid waste except at construction or demolition landfills, inert waste landfills, or lined municipal solid waste landfills having operating landfill gas collection systems directed to beneficial uses — three exceptions, and the current text carries no commencement date. And there is a fourth restriction usually left off the list: 12-8-40.3 makes it unlawful to dispose of any roofing shingles which contain asphalt except in construction and demolition or municipal solid waste landfills.
Sources: O.C.G.A. 12-8-28, lead acid vehicle batteries · O.C.G.A. 12-8-40.1, tire disposal restrictions · O.C.G.A. 12-8-40.2, yard trimmings disposal restrictions · O.C.G.A. 12-8-40.3, disposal of shingles containing asphalt
The only screen that touches your equipment is indirect
Every Georgia landfill runs a load-screening programme. Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. R. 391-3-4-.07(3)(c)(1) requires owners or operators of all landfills to implement a program at the facility for detecting and preventing the disposal of regulated quantities of hazardous wastes, PCB wastes and other prohibited wastes, and sets the minimum contents: random inspections of incoming loads unless the owner or operator takes other steps to ensure that incoming loads do not contain prohibited wastes, records of any inspections, training of facility personnel to recognize prohibited wastes, and notification of the Director if a prohibited waste is discovered at the facility.
So a load can be rejected, recorded and reported to the state even though no electronics ban exists. The trigger is the hazardous waste characteristic, not the device category — and the procedures must be made a part of the operating record, which means the rejection is written down somewhere your name is on.
Sources: Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. Subject 391-3-4, solid waste management
What actually falls on you
Nothing under an e-waste law, because there is none. Obligations arise only where the retired equipment is hazardous waste, and those fall on the generating business. Rule 391-3-11-.01(2) adopts the federal system wholesale, incorporating 40 C.F.R. Parts 124, 260-266, 268, 270, 273 and 279 as amended through October 1, 2021, unless otherwise stated. What that leaves on a business is the familiar set: the hazardous waste determination on retired equipment, an EPA identification number and generator notification, manifests, and the federal record retention periods.
One point the brief for this page got wrong, and we would rather state the rule than repeat a date we cannot find. Rule 391-3-11 contains no small quantity generator re-notification deadline of 1 September 2025 and no four-year cycle. What it does require is notification to the Division on forms provided by the Director from generators, transporters, used-oil processors and TSD owners and operators, within 90 days after rules or revisions become effective — and it states that very small quantity generators are not required to notify. Confirm your own notification status with EPD rather than against a calendar date.
Sources: Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. Subject 391-3-11, hazardous waste management
Georgia adds no universal waste category of its own
Rule 391-3-11-.18 reads, in its entirety on this point, that 40 C.F.R. Part 273 is hereby incorporated by reference. Nothing is added. There is no Georgia universal waste category for electronics, for CRTs or for anything else beyond the federal list of batteries, pesticides, mercury-containing equipment and lamps.
That is the opposite of New Jersey, where the state's own universal waste additions are exactly where enterprise equipment lands. In Georgia there is no softer intermediate category to fall into: equipment either fails a characteristic and is fully regulated hazardous waste, or it does not.
Sources: Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. Subject 391-3-11, hazardous waste management
Penalties, and the drafting is lopsided
O.C.G.A. 12-8-30.6(a) caps the civil penalty against a public authority or a city or county government at not more than $1,000, plus $500 for each day the violation continues. For any other person — which is to say every private business in the state — the figure is $25,000.00 per day, for each day the violation continues.
Criminal exposure under 12-8-30.8(a) covers five kinds of knowing conduct, including transporting solid waste to an unpermitted facility, disposing without a permit, making a false statement in any application, label, manifest, record, report, permit, or other document, destroying or failing to file required records, and transporting without a required manifest. The penalty is a fine of not more than $50,000.00 for each day of violation, or imprisonment of one to two years — three for the first two paragraphs — and a repeat conviction doubles both. Subsection (b) reaches the entity: an organization can be convicted where the conduct was authorized, requested, commanded, or recklessly tolerated by the board of directors of the organization or by a managerial official who is acting within the scope of such official's employment on behalf of the organization.
Sources: O.C.G.A. 12-8-30.6, civil penalties · O.C.G.A. 12-8-30.8, criminal penalties
On the data, and the duty reaches drives directly
O.C.G.A. 10-15-2 provides that a business may not discard a record containing personal information unless it shreds the customer's record before discarding the record, erases the personal information contained in the customer's record before discarding the record, modifies the customer's record to make the personal information unreadable before discarding the record, or takes actions that it reasonably believes will ensure that no unauthorized person will have access to the personal information contained in the customer's record for the period between the record's disposal and the record's destruction.
It is not a paper statute. Record is defined at 10-15-1 as any material on which written, drawn, printed, spoken, visual, or electromagnetic information is recorded or preserved, regardless of physical form or characteristics. A decommissioned drive is squarely within that.
Sources: O.C.G.A. 10-15-2, disposal of customer records · O.C.G.A. 10-15-1, definitions
But the scope is narrower than it first looks
Personal information at 10-15-1 is not personal data at large. It is confined to four categories: information about a medical condition, an account or identification number together with a security or access code, information held for the purpose of opening an account or applying for a loan or credit, and information contained in a tax return. And it must belong to a customer — an individual who provides personal information to a business for the purpose of purchasing or leasing a product or obtaining a service from the business.
An HR server holding employee payroll records is not obviously covered, because an employee did not provide that information to purchase a product or obtain a service. The same structural gap Florida has, arrived at through a different definition. Banks subject to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and hospitals subject to HIPAA are excluded from the definition of business outright.
Sources: O.C.G.A. 10-15-1, definitions
There is a penalty, and it is frequently reported as absent
This is worth stating plainly because the contrary claim circulates widely. O.C.G.A. 10-15-6(a) provides that if the Attorney General determines, after notice and hearing, that a business has violated Code Section 10-15-2, the Attorney General may issue an administrative order imposing a penalty of not more than $500.00 for each customer's record that contains personal information that is wrongfully disposed of or discarded; provided, however, in no event shall the total fine levied by the Attorney General exceed $10,000.00.
It carries an affirmative defence: it shall be an affirmative defense to the wrongful disposing of or discarding of a customer's record that contains personal information if the business can show that it used due diligence in its attempt to properly dispose of or discard such records. Which is a direct argument for keeping the evidence of what a vendor did with the drives. Enforcement runs through the Attorney General under 10-15-5, with all investigative powers available under the Fair Business Practices Act of 1975 including the power to issue investigative demands and subpoenas; hearings follow the Georgia Administrative Procedure Act; and 10-15-6(d) lets the Attorney General reduce the order to a superior court judgment with the same effect as a judgment rendered by the court.
Sources: O.C.G.A. 10-15-6, penalty · O.C.G.A. 10-15-5, enforcement
A source disagreement worth flagging, and we are not resolving it
The Georgia Attorney General's own consumer material describes the shred-or-erase duty and attributes it to O.C.G.A. Section 10-15-1. That section is the definitions section. The operative prohibition is at 10-15-2, and 10-15-6(a) ties the penalty specifically to a violation of Code Section 10-15-2 rather than to Chapter 15 generally.
We cite both. Where the two disagree the statute controls, and anyone quoting the Attorney General's citation in a contract or a policy document is quoting a definitions section as though it imposed a duty. The underlying description of the duty is accurate; only the section number is wrong.
Sources: Georgia Attorney General, Consumer Protection Division · O.C.G.A. 10-15-1, definitions · O.C.G.A. 10-15-2, disposal of customer records
And here Georgia inverts the usual pattern
The breach-notice duty at O.C.G.A. 10-1-912(a) runs only to an information broker or data collector. Data collector is defined at 10-1-911 as state and local government agencies and their subdivisions. Information broker means a person who, for monetary fees or dues, is in the business of compiling personal information for the primary purpose of furnishing personal information to nonaffiliated third parties.
An ordinary Georgia business selling software, manufacturing parts or running a hospital laundry is neither, and so has no statutory breach-notice duty of its own. Yet it is unambiguously a business that may not discard a record containing personal information without shredding, erasing or modifying it first. Georgia is one of the few states in this directory where the media-sanitization duty is the broader of the two — and where the thing driving a sanitization decision is therefore the disposal statute, not the breach statute everyone reads first.
Sources: O.C.G.A. 10-1-912, breach notification · O.C.G.A. 10-1-911, definitions
And one nobody expects: selling the scrap can pull in the sheriff
Georgia regulates secondary metals recyclers through the sheriff rather than through an environmental agency. Under O.C.G.A. 10-1-359.1(a) it is unlawful for any secondary metals recycler to purchase regulated metal property in any amount without being registered, and registration is with the sheriff of each county in which the secondary metals recycler maintains a place of business, on a form promulgated by the Secretary of State, for a fee not to exceed $200.00. Each registration shall be valid for a 12 month period, and the record of each registration is entered into an electronic data base accessible statewide and searchable by all law enforcement agencies in this state. Violating that section is a misdemeanor of a high and aggravated nature.
The record-keeping at 10-1-353 is what makes this feel unlike an environmental rule. A purchase transaction record includes the weight, quantity or volume and a description of the property, a digital photograph of the property, a scanned identification card of both the seller and the deliverer, the identification type and number, name and date of birth, and a photograph, videotape, or digital recording depicting a recognizable facial image of the seller and of the deliverer — retained for not less than two years.
Sources: O.C.G.A. 10-1-359.1, registration of secondary metals recyclers · O.C.G.A. 10-1-353, purchase transaction records · Georgia EPD, Georgia Secondary Metals Compliance Guide
Whether any of that reaches you is genuinely unsettled
The duties above sit on the buyer. But there is an exemption directly in the path of an enterprise seller, and we are presenting it as unresolved rather than answering it. O.C.G.A. 10-1-358 provides that the article shall not apply to purchases of regulated metal property from, among five other categories, a manufacturing, industrial, or other commercial vendor that generates or sells regulated metal property in the ordinary course of its business, provided that such vendor is not a secondary metals recycler.
A company that retires a rack every few years is a commercial vendor, and it is not a secondary metals recycler. Whether a periodic hardware refresh generates or sells regulated metal property in the ordinary course of its business is the whole question, and the statute does not define ordinary course. Read one way the exemption removes the photograph, the scanned identification and the database entry entirely; read the other way it does not. Note also that the duty is not purely one-sided: 10-1-353(d) makes it a violation for a seller to sign the statutory ownership statement knowing it to be false, subjecting the seller to the civil and criminal liability provided in Code Section 10-1-359.2. Ask a prospective buyer whether it holds a current sheriff's registration, and expect the answer to matter more than the exemption does.
Sources: O.C.G.A. 10-1-358, purchases exempted from the article · O.C.G.A. 10-1-353, purchase transaction records
Who administers it, and what there is to check a vendor against
The Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Environmental Protection Division — Land Protection Branch. It administers solid waste under Subject 391-3-4 and hazardous waste under Subject 391-3-11, and that is the whole of the machinery a business retiring IT equipment interacts with.
Sources: Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. Subject 391-3-4, solid waste management · Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. Subject 391-3-11, hazardous waste management
There is no electronics programme office and no vendor list
EPD maintains no electronics recycler registry, no approved-vendor list and no stated preference that a business use a certified recycler. Its recycling page points to third-party national resources. Florida's environmental agency at least recommends third-party certification while declining to keep a list; Georgia does not go that far, because there is no programme for it to attach the recommendation to.
Which leaves third-party certification as the only verification available in Georgia. There is no state list to cross-reference a vendor against, so the certificate, its scope and its status are the evidence — and this directory carries no Georgia registration marker for any vendor, because there is no Georgia registration to carry.
Sources: Georgia EPD, recycling and waste reduction resources
Regulatory position checked 17 Sept 2026. State law changes; verify before relying on it.
Certified vendors in Georgia
| Company | Georgia cities | Certification | Appendix scope | Expires | Verified on |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evernex USA Holdco Inc Parent for XS International LLC aka XSi | Alpharetta | R2v3 | Not yet read | 29 Jul 2027 | 14 Sept 2026 |
| Full Circle Electronics GA, LLC dba Atlanta Recycling Solutions | Alpharetta | R2v3 | Not yet read | 9 Jan 2027 | 14 Sept 2026 |
| Southeast Computer Recyclers Corp DBA SECR | Alpharetta | R2v3 | Not yet read | 3 Oct 2028 | 14 Sept 2026 |
| Apto Solutions | Atlanta | R2v3 | Not yet read | 27 Oct 2028 | 14 Sept 2026 |
| Jiucheng International (Georgia) Inc dba JCI Envoka Group | Atlanta | R2v3 | Not yet read | 20 Mar 2028 | 14 Sept 2026 |
| QGistix, LLC/Green Wave Computer Recycling, LLC dba Green Wave Electronics | Atlanta | R2v3 | Downstream recycling · Data sanitization (logical, physical) · Test and repair · Materials recovery | 16 Jan 2028 | 14 Sept 2026 |
| Sims Recycling Solutions, Inc., DBA Sims Lifecycle Services | Atlanta | R2v3 | Downstream recycling · Data sanitization (logical, physical) · Test and repair · Materials recovery · Brokering | 29 Oct 2028 | 14 Sept 2026 |
| Tom Seabrook Co. DBA TSC, Inc. | Auburn | R2v3 | Not yet read | 28 Dec 2028 | 14 Sept 2026 |
| Blue Revive Technology Co. | Buford | R2v3 | Downstream recycling · Test and repair · Materials recovery | 25 Jul 2027 | 14 Sept 2026 |
| Refurbished Asset Management LLC | Buford | R2v3 | Not yet read | 28 Dec 2028 | 14 Sept 2026 |
| Battery Recycling Made Easy, LLC DBA BRME, LLC | Calhoun | R2v3 | Downstream recycling · Materials recovery | 19 Apr 2029 | 14 Sept 2026 |
| B2B Exports LLC | Chamblee | R2v3 | Not yet read | 18 Jul 2027 | 14 Sept 2026 |
| Georgia Computer Inc. | Cumming | R2v3 | Not yet read | 25 May 2029 | 14 Sept 2026 |
| Premier Surplus, Inc. a wholly owned subsidiary of Iron Mountain ALM | Dawsonville | R2v3 | Not yet read | 14 Feb 2028 | 14 Sept 2026 |
| Computer Wholesalers, Inc. | Duluth | R2v3 | Not yet read | 24 Nov 2028 | 14 Sept 2026 |
| PedalPoint EvTerra Recycling, LLC dba PedalPoint Recycling | Forest Park | R2v3 | Downstream recycling · Data sanitization (logical, physical) · Test and repair · Materials recovery · Brokering · Photovoltaic modules | 4 Feb 2028 | 14 Sept 2026 |
| Revalue Tech LLC | Gainesville | R2v3 | Not yet read | 8 Dec 2028 | 14 Sept 2026 |
| ThinkTLS, LLC | Gainesville | R2v3 | Downstream recycling · Data sanitization (logical, physical) · Test and repair · Materials recovery · Brokering | 8 Aug 2027 | 14 Sept 2026 |
| ER Teck Inc | Hoschton | R2v3 | Not yet read | 26 Jun 2028 | 14 Sept 2026 |
| FR Vision Inc. | Hoschton | R2v3 | Not yet read | 16 Jun 2028 | 14 Sept 2026 |
| Global Technology Services Group, Inc. | Kennesaw | R2v3 | Not yet read | 6 Feb 2029 | 14 Sept 2026 |
| Phobio LLC | Kennesaw | R2v3 | Not yet read | 12 Oct 2028 | 14 Sept 2026 |
| CompuPoint USA LLC | Lawrenceville | R2v3 | Not yet read | 31 May 2029 | 14 Sept 2026 |
| INS Brokers, Inc. DBA ViaTeK Solutions | Lawrenceville | R2v3 | Not yet read | 12 Aug 2028 | 14 Sept 2026 |
| Two Rivers Recovery, LLC dba TwoRivers ITAD Solutions | Lithonia | R2v3 | Not yet read | 14 Dec 2026 | 14 Sept 2026 |
| Equip Exports LLC DBA Equip Recycling | Macon | R2v3 | Not yet read | 5 Jan 2029 | 14 Sept 2026 |
| Devin Tech Inc | Marietta | R2v3 | Not yet read | 17 Nov 2028 | 14 Sept 2026 |
| Novus Solutions, LLC | Marietta | R2v3 | Not yet read | 3 May 2029 | 14 Sept 2026 |
| CentricsIT, LLC | Norcross | R2v3 | Not yet read | 29 Jan 2029 | 14 Sept 2026 |
| Critical Technology Services LLC | Norcross | R2v3 | Downstream recycling · Data sanitization (logical, physical) · Test and repair | 3 Jan 2029 | 14 Sept 2026 |
| eWaste ePlanet, LLC | Norcross | R2v3 | Not yet read | 14 Dec 2028 | 14 Sept 2026 |
| Majestic Global Corporation | Norcross | R2v3 | Not yet read | 30 Apr 2028 | 14 Sept 2026 |
| North Georgia Telecom Inc | Norcross | R2v3 | Not yet read | 3 Oct 2027 | 14 Sept 2026 |
| Relutech, LLC | Norcross | R2v3 | Not yet read | 8 Jan 2027 | 14 Sept 2026 |
| ITAD Technologies LLC | Peachtree Corners | R2v3 | Not yet read | 3 May 2027 | 14 Sept 2026 |
| Inteleca | Smyrna | R2v3 | Not yet read | 21 Jan 2028 | 14 Sept 2026 |
| Providence Green LLC | South Fulton | R2v3 | Not yet read | 22 Apr 2029 | 14 Sept 2026 |
| Computer Recyclers USA, LLC | Suwanee | R2v3 | Downstream recycling · Data sanitization (logical, physical) · Test and repair | 21 Jun 2029 | 14 Sept 2026 |
| AMP Group LLC | Toccoa | R2v3 | Not yet read | 11 Jul 2028 | 14 Sept 2026 |
| E-Recycle International, Inc DBA E-Recycle USA | Tucker | R2v3 | Not yet read | 23 Feb 2029 | 14 Sept 2026 |
| Ecos Recycling LLC | Tucker | R2v3 | Not yet read | 11 Nov 2028 | 14 Sept 2026 |
| SK Tes (formerly DataServ Group) | Tucker | R2v3 | Not yet read | 21 Jul 2029 | 12 Sept 2026 |
Every current certification held in Georgia is R2v3. No vendor here holds an e-Stewards, NAID AAA or RIOS certification that the issuing register currently shows as live.
The issuing register does not publish a certificate number in the export behind this table, and does not pin a certificate to an individual facility. Each row links to the vendor profile, where the register entry it was read from is linked directly.
Cities
- Norcross6
- Atlanta4
- Alpharetta3
- Tucker3
- Buford2
- Gainesville2
- Hoschton2
- Kennesaw2
- Lawrenceville2
- Marietta2
- Auburn1
- Calhoun1
- Chamblee1
- Cumming1
- Dawsonville1
- Duluth1
- Forest Park1
- Lithonia1
- Macon1
- Peachtree Corners1
- Smyrna1
- South Fulton1
- Suwanee1
- Toccoa1
Georgia in context
Atlanta is not the centre of this. Norcross holds 6 facilities to Atlanta's 4, and the state's 42 facilities spread across 24 cities. Alpharetta and Tucker sit behind both, and no other city in the state reaches three. The concentration is along the I-85 corridor north-east of the city rather than inside it, which is worth knowing before a buyer filters a search on the metro name and sees the smaller half of the market.